The impact of suction addition to simple water seal on the outcomes after pulmonary surgery: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chest tube drainage during pulmonary surgery is fundamental to removing air and fluid, as well as for lung re-expansion. However, the advantages of adding external suction to the water seal are under debate. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to conduct a meta-analysis in order to assess the effects of adding suction to a simple water seal on the outcomes of lung surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search of the literature up to November 2021 found 14 studies with 2449 lung surgery patients. Of these patients, 1092 received suction drainage and 1357 received a simple water-seal drainage. The studies reported the effects of adding suction to a simple water seal on postoperative outcomes after lung surgery. A randomor fixed-effect model determined the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to compare the outcomes. RESULTS: In patients undergoing lung surgery, suction resulted in a substantially longer chest tube duration (MD = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.90-1.40, p = 0.03, Z = 2.21) and a smaller postoperative pneumothorax (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13-0.59, p = 0.02, Z = 2.24) than a simple water seal. However, no differences existed in prolonged air leak (p = 0.91, Z = 0.12), air leak duration (p = 0.28, Z = 1.07) or length of hospital stay (p = 0.23, Z = 1.2) between the 2 approaches. CONCLUSION: Suction led to considerably longer chest tube duration and lower postoperative pneumothorax, but no significant difference in sustained air leak, air leak duration or length of hospital stay was observed compared to a simple water seal in patients undergoing pulmonary surgery. Further research is needed to validate these findings and increase confidence, particularly regarding the postoperative pneumothorax results.

Effect of continuous nursing combined with respiratory exercise nursing on pulmonary function of postoperative patients with lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is a malignant tumor with high morbidity and mortality among cancers. Surgery is currently one of the primary methods of treating lung cancer. Although it can slow down the progression of the disease by removing the lesion, this invasive surgery inevitably damages the integrity of the patient's chest. Moreover, the patient's pulmonary function may have a low compensatory capacity after surgery, causing various respiratory diseases such as atelectasis, respiratory function decline, and even serious cardiovascular disease. All of these have great negative impacts on the surgical effect and the prognosis of patients. With the continuous exploration and development of nursing, continuous nursing and respiratory exercise nursing have been gradually applied in the nursing of patients after lung cancer surgery, and have achieved good nursing results. AIM: To investigate the effect of continuous nursing combined with respiratory exercise nursing on the pulmonary function of postoperative patients with lung cancer. METHODS: A total of 80 patients with lung cancer who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021 were selected as the study subjects. All subjects were randomly divided into the control group (n = 40 cases) and the experimental group (n = 40 cases). Patients with lung cancer in the control group were given conventional nursing after surgery, while the experimental group was given continuous nursing combined with respiratory exercise nursing based on conventional nursing. The recovery of pulmonary function and respiratory symptoms was observed before and after 3 mo of intervention in both groups. The pulmonary function parameters, blood gas analysis, MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-lung cancer module (MDASI-LC) scores, incidence of pulmonary complications, and Morisky compliance scores were compared between the two groups before and after 3 mo of intervention. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in pulmonary function and blood gas analysis between the two groups before intervention (P > 0.05). 3 mo after the intervention, the pulmonary function parameters in the experimental group (SpO2, VC, MVV, FEV1, FEV1% pred, and FEV1/FVC) were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in blood gas analysis between the two groups before intervention (P > 0.05). PaO2 in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group, and PaCO2 was significantly lower than that in the control group 3 mo after the intervention. The difference had statistical significance (P < 0.05). 3 mo after the intervention, the MDASI score of respiratory symptoms in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and the incidence of pulmonary complications was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). In addition, the treatment compliance and nursing satisfaction of patients in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Continuous nursing combined with respiratory exercise nursing can significantly accelerate the recovery of respiratory function in postoperative lung cancer patients, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications of lung cancer as well as improve the treatment compliance of patients.